Executive Summary

Most PE firms get their first Head of Value Creation hire wrong. Not because they pick the wrong candidate, but because they skip the internal work that should happen before the search begins.

The failures are expensive. Research from Leadership IQ reveals that nearly 80% of new hires fail within the first 18 months. For executive-level positions, the Center for American Progress estimates replacement costs can reach 213% of annual salary. But the real cost isn’t the search fee or severance—it’s the 12-18 months your portfolio didn’t get the attention it needed while you hired, realized it wasn’t working, and started over.

The stakes have never been higher. McKinsey’s 2025 Global Private Markets Report confirms that operational improvements now drive the majority of returns at top-performing funds. General partners that focus on creating value through asset operations achieve 2-3 percentage points higher IRR on average compared with peers. With entry multiples at 11.9x EBITDA and leverage no longer the primary value driver, your competitors were compounding operational value while you were managing an HR problem.
‍
This framework synthesizes patterns from 30+ PE operating team buildouts. It’s designed for Managing Partners, Heads of Talent, and COOs who recognize that getting this hire right is a competitive necessity—and that the work starts long before a recruiter makes the first call.

‍The Cost of Getting This Wrong

A failed first Head of Value Creation hire creates cascading problems that extend far beyond the direct costs of the search.

Lost Value Creation

Operations now drive 47% of value creation in buyouts—up from just 18% in the 1980s. This shift reflects a fundamental transformation: with high entry multiples and compressed returns, financial engineering and multiple expansion are no longer sufficient to generate target returns. The industry’s shift from financial engineering to operational excellence is permanent.
‍
Every month your portfolio operates without effective operational support represents foregone value. McKinsey research shows companies adopting accelerated performance transformation can improve EBITDA by more than 500 basis points within the first year. A failed hire delays that impact by 18-24 months while you identify the problem, manage the exit, and restart the search.

‍Competitive Disadvantage

Top-quartile funds now derive approximately 39% of returns from revenue growth and margin expansion versus 61% from multiples and leverage. Funds with dedicated operating partners achieve 1.7x higher operational EBITDA improvements compared to those relying solely on management. While you’re managing turnover, your competitors are deploying operating resources across their portfolios.

With average holding periods now at 6.7 years—the longest since 2005—operational value creation isn’t optional. It’s the primary lever for returns.

LP Perception

A failed ops hire signals that your operational capabilities aren’t what you sold in fundraising. As operational due diligence has intensified, 79% of LPs report significantly deepening their operational scrutiny in the past year, and 85% have rejected investment opportunities over operational concerns. Your next fund pitch depends on articulating what ops delivers—vague answers won’t cut it.
‍‍

Reputation Risk

The candidate market is smaller than you think. Stories travel fast. A lowball offer or unclear carry structure doesn’t just cost you one hire—it becomes your reputation in the market. Top candidates are fielding calls from 3-4 funds, including firms you’ll see across the table on deals. A poorly handled search process affects your access to talent for years.
‍

The Pre-Search Framework

The firms that build elite operating functions treat this hire like a platform acquisition: with rigor, alignment, and a clear thesis on value creation. Work through every section below before you go to market.

1. Mandate & Scope

Define what this person will own—not just “work on.” The ambiguity that seems harmless during the search becomes toxic once someone is in the role.

• Define specific value creation levers this role will own: revenue growth, cost reduction, commercial excellence, talent management, technology enablement, or all of the above
• Clarify decision-making authority: what decisions can they make without seeking approval from deal partners?
• Determine diligence involvement: full integration from sourcing, post-LOI only, or exclusively post-close?
• Establish whether this is a player-coach doing the work, or a leader building a team from day one
• Define escalation paths: when operational insights conflict with deal team assumptions, who decides?

Pattern recognition: Scope creep is the silent killer of first ops hires. Without clear boundaries, these roles become the dumping ground for everything deal teams don’t want to handle. The best first hires have a defined lane and the authority to stay in it.

2. Internal Alignment

This is where most first hires fail. Deal teams that don’t buy in will quietly undermine the role. You’ll burn a year and a good candidate’s reputation before you realize it.

• Have explicit conversations with each deal partner about diligence involvement expectations—not assumptions, conversations
• Align on how deal teams will position ops with portfolio CEOs during and after the transaction
• Have the honest conversation: is ops viewed as a value driver or cost center internally? The answer affects everything.
• Address credit-sharing dynamics explicitly: how will operational improvements be attributed in investment memos and LP reporting?
• Establish conflict resolution protocols: when ops and deal teams disagree on approach, who has final authority?

Pattern recognition: Watch for the warning signs. If deal partners roll their eyes when ops comes up, or if conversations about involvement are met with “we’ll figure it out,” you’re not ready. The firms that succeed at this have deal team buy-in before the first candidate conversation.

3. Organizational Design

Structure signals strategy. Every organizational choice you make communicates something to candidates, LPs, and portfolio company management teams.

• Determine reporting line: to a Managing Partner, COO, or the partnership broadly? LPs notice.
• Decide on title deliberately: “Operating Partner” suggests parity with deal partners; “Head of Value Creation” signals function leadership; “VP Portfolio Operations” reads as more junior. Each attracts different candidate pools.
• Clarify board involvement: observer seats, full board seats, or no board presence? This affects candidate caliber significantly.
• Align on travel requirements realistically—these roles often demand 50-70% travel. Underselling this creates early friction.
• Determine investment committee participation: will this person have a voice in deal decisions? The best candidates expect it.

Pattern recognition: Title matters more than most firms realize. “Operating Partner” attracts former CEOs and divisional presidents. “Director of Portfolio Operations” attracts senior consultants. Both can work—but make the choice deliberately.

4. Candidate Profile

The best candidates are fielding calls from 3-4 funds right now, including your co-investors. Slow process or unclear thinking means you’ll lose them—and see them across the table at your next deal.

• Make the generalist vs. specialist decision explicitly: for a first hire, breadth usually beats depth. You need someone who can address whatever the portfolio throws at them.
• Understand the trade-offs between consulting backgrounds, operating executives, and PE-native talent—each brings different strengths and risks
• Prioritize relationship skills: this role demands influence without authority across deal teams, portfolio company management, and the partnership
• Define what “PE-ready” means for your firm: comfort with ambiguity, speed of execution, ability to influence without mandating
• Be realistic about what you’re offering: top candidates have options. Are you competitive?

Background Trade-offs

Pattern recognition: Divisional presidents and consulting partners often struggle in first ops roles—not because they lack capability, but because the influence-without-authority dynamic is unfamiliar. Screen explicitly for this.

5. Compensation & Economics

Candidates talk. A lowball offer or unclear carry structure doesn’t just cost you one hire—it becomes your reputation in a market smaller than you think.

• Establish your position on base, bonus, carried interest, and co-investment before going to market
• Determine carry structure: fund-level, deal-by-deal, or synthetic/phantom—each has trade-offs and signals different things to candidates
• Define how economics evolve as the function scales: if this hire succeeds, what does year three look like?
• Benchmark against funds candidates will actually compare you to—not the median, but your competitive set
• Be prepared to articulate the path to partnership or partner-equivalent economics if that’s realistic

Market context: The 2026 Press & Associates Compensation Report shows that 80-92% of senior operating professionals now receive carried interest, with average base compensation for Operating Partners ranging from $400,000-$600,000 depending on fund size. Total compensation can reach $1-3 million annually at mega-funds when carry distributions are included. Compensation variation of 2-3x exists for identical roles—which means your offer either wins or loses.

Pattern recognition: Carry structure matters as much as quantum. Fund-level carry aligns incentives with the partnership but dilutes individual deal impact. Deal-by-deal carry creates stronger ties to specific transactions but can create friction with deal teams. Decide what you’re optimizing for.

6. Portfolio Dynamics

The state of your portfolio shapes what this person will actually do in year one. Be honest about it.

• Assess current portfolio state honestly: turnarounds require different skills than growth optimization
• Identify which CEOs will embrace ops involvement and which will resist—this determines early wins and challenges
• Consider timing relative to fund cycle: early deployment offers more runway; pre-exit portfolios need different intervention
• Map the relationship dynamics: which deal partners own which companies, and what are their working styles?
• Identify 2-3 early-win opportunities where operational improvement can create visible impact in the first 90 days

Pattern recognition: Early wins matter more than you think. The first ops hire needs to demonstrate value quickly to build credibility with skeptical deal teams. If your portfolio doesn’t have obvious improvement opportunities, the role will struggle to gain traction.

7. Success Definition

This isn’t just about managing the hire—it’s about articulating to LPs what your ops investment delivers.

• Define what “good” looks like at 12 months in specific, measurable terms—not just “integrated well” or “adding value”
• Align all partners on that definition before the search begins—not after the hire is struggling
• Establish how to measure impact when operational improvements take years to show in fund returns
• Create leading indicators: process improvements, team satisfaction, CEO feedback, initiative completion rates
• Build in a 90-day check-in structure to identify issues early, before they become irreversible

Pattern recognition: Vague success criteria create cover for failure. When the definition is “we’ll know it when we see it,” partners can claim dissatisfaction at any time for any reason. Get specificity before you make the hire.‍

Common Failure Patterns

Understanding why first ops hires fail helps you avoid the same mistakes. These patterns appear repeatedly.

Deal Team Misalignment

The most common failure mode. Deal partners who weren’t consulted, don’t buy in, or feel threatened quietly marginalize the ops function. Signs include: ops is excluded from diligence conversations, deal teams position ops as “free consulting” to portfolio companies, or partners complain about ops “slowing down” deals. By the time this becomes visible, it’s usually too late to save the hire.

Scope Creep and Undefined Mandate

Without clear boundaries, the ops role becomes a catch-all. The hire spends time on low-value activities—fielding one-off requests, managing vendor relationships, handling HR issues at portfolio companies—instead of driving meaningful value creation. Within 18 months, they’re burned out and the firm questions whether they’re delivering.

Compensation Miscalibration

Underpaying relative to market means you either can’t attract top talent or you hire someone who leaves for a better offer within 18 months. Overpaying creates internal tension with deal teams. But the most common error is unclear carry: candidates accept roles with vague promises, then become frustrated when the reality doesn’t match their expectations.

Wrong Background for the Role

Consultants who’ve never executed. Operators who can’t influence without authority. Corporate executives who expect deference that PE doesn’t provide. The skills that created success in their previous role may not transfer. Screen explicitly for the unique demands of PE operating work.

No Early Wins Available

If the portfolio doesn’t have obvious improvement opportunities, the ops hire can’t demonstrate value. They struggle to build credibility, deal teams question the investment, and the role atrophies. Before hiring, identify where this person will make a visible difference in their first 90 days.

What the Best Firms Do Differently

The firms that build elite operating capabilities share common patterns. None of these are revolutionary—they’re about rigor and intentionality.

They Treat It Like a Platform Acquisition

Same diligence rigor, same alignment requirements, same clarity on value creation thesis. They define the investment thesis for the ops function: what will it enable, how will it create value, what does success look like? They pressure-test assumptions with the partnership before going to market.

They Get Partnership Alignment First

Not after the hire, not during the search—before. Every partner understands what the ops function will do, how it will interact with deal teams, and what success looks like. Concerns are surfaced and addressed before candidates are in the mix.

They Invest in Onboarding

The first 90 days are structured: introductions to every portfolio company CEO, ride-alongs with deal teams during diligence, clear initial projects with measurable outcomes. The hire isn’t left to “figure it out”—they’re set up for early wins.

They Create Feedback Loops

Regular check-ins with partnership and portfolio company CEOs. Issues surface early, not when they’ve become terminal. The relationship between ops and deal teams is actively managed, not left to chance.

They Have Realistic Expectations

They understand that operational improvements take time to show in returns. They define leading indicators that demonstrate progress. They don’t expect a single hire to transform their portfolio in year one—they’re building a capability, not hiring a miracle worker.

Treat This Like a Platform Acquisition

A failed first ops hire is a competitive problem. Lost value creation, a signal to LPs your capabilities aren’t what you sold them, and a story that travels fast in a market smaller than you think.

The firms that succeed approach this hire with the same rigor they’d apply to any platform acquisition: clear thesis, thorough diligence, aligned stakeholders, realistic integration plan, and measurable success criteria.

The pre-search work isn’t optional. It’s the difference between building a competitive advantage and creating an expensive distraction.

Do the work before you go to market.

Sources & References

1. McKinsey & Company, “Global Private Markets Report 2025: Braced for Shifting Weather,” May 2025. Analysis of PE value creation attribution and IRR performance by operational focus.

2. McKinsey & Company, “Bridging Private Equity’s Value Creation Gap,” April 2024. Analysis of 100+ PE funds showing 2-3 percentage point IRR advantage for operationally-focused GPs.

3. Bain & Company, “Global Private Equity Report 2025.” Industry analysis of entry multiples, hold periods, and value creation drivers.

4. Leadership IQ, “Why New Hires Fail.” Research finding approximately 80% of new hires fail within 18 months.

5. Center for American Progress, “There Are Significant Business Costs to Replacing Employees.” Analysis showing executive replacement costs reaching 213% of annual salary.

6. Heidrick & Struggles, “2025 North America Private Equity Investment Professional Compensation Survey.” 820+ respondent analysis of PE compensation trends.

7. Private Equity International, “Operating Partners Compensation Survey 2024.” 314 respondent analysis of operating partner compensation and team structures.

8. CSC, “The Limited Partner’s Guide to Fund Operations,” 2025. Survey of 150 LPs showing 79% have deepened operational scrutiny and 85% have rejected investments over operational concerns.

9. Umbrex, “Private Equity Operating Partner Groups,” May 2025. Comprehensive analysis of PE operating models and historical evolution.

10. Press & Associates, “2026 PE Portfolio Operations Compensation Report.” Proprietary analysis of 600+ operating professionals across North American PE firms.

‍

—

‍

Press & Associates

Specialist Executive Search for Private Equity Value Creation

pressandassociates.com